Should we be encouraged by their thoroughness, or alarmed by how off base they were?
« We know what's good for you | Main | The glass is one-tenth empty »
Should we be encouraged by their thoroughness, or alarmed by how off base they were?
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.oobleck.com/mt3/mt-tb.cgi/970
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on October 21, 2003 11:27 PM.
The previous post in this blog was We know what's good for you.
The next post in this blog is The glass is one-tenth empty.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Comments (2)
I'd say "encouraged by their thoroughness". It's totally plausible that a terrorist thinking of blowing up the bridge would ask questions under a different guise, and the most obvious guise is that of a student doing a school project. So it's a reasonable use of resources to check with the school that the story checks out.
Moreover, they're probably not spending all that much time tracking down students doing research projects, since no similar incidents were mentioned in the article.
Posted by Poop | October 22, 2003 3:28 AM
Posted on October 22, 2003 03:28
Well, I don't know how plausible it is that a terrorist would do research by calling up the government and asking questions of them -- but if the government had infinite resources, I would agree that it's encouraging. But at a time when they ignore emails telling them that people have smuggled weapons through airport security, they clearly don't have the resources to be sending agents to visit middle schools. Couldn't this have been cleared up with a phone call?
Posted by David Nieporent | October 26, 2003 11:55 AM
Posted on October 26, 2003 11:55